Give A Big F**k You to Privacy with Meta Glasses

YouTube thumbnail for "Thoughts Off The Stem" featuring a man in a black Champion hoodie and NBA hat looking shocked. Large, bold text reads "GIVE A BIG F**K YOU TO PRIVACY WITH META GLASSES." The background is a green-lit studio with a neon cannabis leaf sign, a microphone, and a laptop with a TOTS420 sticker.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

New tech is cool. I genuinely love it. That is, if you’re willing to give a big F**k you to privacy with gadgets like meta glasses. Don’t get me wrong innovation is amazing and the fact that we live in a world where you can walk around with a computer on your face like you’re in Minority Report swiping through files and checking your messages while you grab a coffee, is pretty cool.

But here’s the question nobody seems to be asking.

Do the people building this stuff actually think about what happens when real humans use it in the real world? And do we — the consumers — think about the potential consequences before we hand over our money and our data and apparently our most private moments?

I’m not so sure we do.

Welcome to Thoughts Off The Stem. I’m Justin Barone and this week we need to talk about Meta glasses, Tesla batteries, wearable tech privacy and the fundamental disconnect between building something cool and thinking it all the way through.


Meta Glasses: Cool Concept, Terrifying Reality

Meta glasses are genuinely impressive technology. Wearable, stylish, functional — the most recent incarnation of a concept that’s been trying to work for years. And now they actually kind of do work which is both exciting and deeply concerning.

Here’s what nobody thought about.

When they’re on, they’re on. And they see everything.

If you’re wearing them while shaving your balls — that’s on file. If you forget to take them off before you head off to handle some personal business — congratulations, you just made POV content and it’s sitting on Meta’s servers right now.

If you’re recording with your face, you’d think — you’d think about that.

Apparently not.

I’ll be honest — when I was a kid I had to wear a heart monitor from time to time as part of my yearly checkups for a heart condition. And even then, as a kid, I was worried about what it would tell the doctors. Like why is your heart rate spiking at 10:30 at night? That’s nobody’s business.

Now imagine that same energy but it’s a camera. On your face. Connected to Meta’s servers. Worn by millions of people who didn’t fully read the terms and conditions.


What Meta Workers Are Actually Seeing

Here’s where it stops being funny and starts being genuinely disturbing.

Meta workers — specifically Kenyan subcontractor employees — have blown the whistle on what they’ve actually seen while reviewing footage captured through users smart glasses. And the Dude For Real segment this week pulled directly from their accounts.

What Meta Workers ReportedThe Reality
Users going to the toilet or getting undressed on cameraPeople wearing the glasses without realizing they’re recording
A man leaving glasses on a bedside table — wife undresses in frameAccidental recording of private moments without consent
“We see everything — from living rooms to naked bodies”Meta has this content in its databases right now
Workers told not to question what they see or they’ll be firedNo accountability for what’s being stored or reviewed
Two US citizens filed a lawsuit in San Francisco against MetaFalse advertising and disregarding privacy laws
Meta being investigated by multiple governmentsThe pervert glasses problem is now an international issue

Two US citizens have filed a lawsuit in San Francisco accusing Meta of false advertising and disregarding privacy laws. Multiple governments are now investigating. And somewhere in Meta’s servers there is content that people recorded without having any idea they were recording it.

They’re calling them the pervert glasses now. Which honestly feels about right.


Tesla Batteries and the $25,000 Surprise

Meta glasses aren’t the only example of consumers not thinking things through. Let’s talk about Tesla for a second.

A few years ago first generation Tesla owners started showing up at dealerships and getting hit with a $25,000 repair bill for battery replacement. And a lot of them were genuinely shocked.

Here’s my take — that’s on the consumer.

When I buy a car there are a few things I want to know. What does the service maintenance plan look like? How long will this car last? Should I worry about mechanical issues including the engine?

When you buy a Tesla you are buying an electronic device. A very expensive, very large electronic device. And the most basic question you ask when buying any electronic device is — what happens when the battery dies?

People didn’t ask that question. And then they were blindsided by a bill the size of a used car.


The Disconnect: Developers vs Consumers

Here’s the pattern I keep seeing and it applies to Meta glasses, Tesla batteries, and honestly most technology that causes problems after launch.

What They’re Great AtWhat They Generally Suck At
DevelopersBuilding cool innovative technologyThinking about real world human use beyond the tech goal
ConsumersFixating on new shiny thingsThinking about real world consequences before buying

Developers are brilliant at solving technical problems. They are generally not great at asking “but what happens when a regular person uses this in their bedroom at 11pm without thinking about it?”

Consumers are great at wanting the newest thing first. They are generally not great at asking “but what are the actual long term implications of this purchase?”

The result is Meta glasses on Meta servers and $25,000 battery bills and a lawsuit in San Francisco and a bunch of very uncomfortable Kenyan subcontractors who have seen things they cannot unsee.


Weed Facts: Can Technology Actually Detect Cannabis Impairment?

Since we’re talking about tech this week the Weed Facts segment goes there too — because there’s actually some genuinely impressive new technology being developed specifically to detect cannabis impairment. And it’s more accurate than you might think.

The challenge with cannabis impairment testing has always been that THC doesn’t work like alcohol. The amount of THC in your body is not directly correlated with impairment — THC and its metabolites can stay in your system for an extended period, making it impossible to tell from a blood test whether someone is currently impaired or just consumed cannabis days ago.

Enter Gaize.

The ProblemThe Gaize Solution
THC levels in blood don’t indicate current impairmentEye movement tests detect real time impairment regardless of when cannabis was consumed
Human drug recognition officers are subjective — 60-85% accuracyAutomated VR headset testing removes human error
Traditional tests can’t distinguish past use from current impairmentPupillary reflex and ocular motion analysis detects active impairment only
No portable rapid testing solution existedGaize is rapid, portable and automated
Officers can be wrongGaize boasts 98% accuracy

Gaize runs the same eye tests that police officers use — high precision ocular motion and pupillary reflex analysis — through a VR headset using Tobii eye tracking technology. It measures subtle changes in eye movement that indicate impairment with 98% accuracy.

Your eyes tell on you every time. Apparently even when your glasses are recording things they shouldn’t be.


Think Before You Wear It

Here’s the bottom line.

Technology is going to keep advancing faster than our ability to think through all the consequences. That’s not going to change. But the gap between what developers build and what consumers actually do with it in the real world is a gap that’s causing real problems — privacy violations, lawsuits, $25,000 repair bills and a lot of footage on Meta’s servers that nobody consented to share.

Think before you buy. Read the terms and conditions. Ask what happens when the battery dies. And for the love of everything — if you’re going to wear a camera on your face, think about where that camera is pointing.

If you’re recording with your face you’d think — you’d think about that.

Those are my thoughts off the stem. 🍃

Subscribe to our newsletter!


🎙 Listen to the Full Episode

Give A Big F**k You to Privacy with Meta Glasses is out now on Spotify and YouTube.

We go deeper on the Meta privacy lawsuit, the Tesla battery disaster, Gaize impairment technology and the full Dude For Real breakdown of what Meta workers have actually seen through users smart glasses.

👇 Listen or watch right now:

🎧 SPOTIFY LINK ▶️ YOUTUBE LINK

New episodes drop every Friday at 4:20PM. Subscribe so the sesh comes straight to you — we’re pushing to 1,000 followers on Spotify and every follow counts.

Join the sesh at tots420.com 🌿

Contact Thoughts Off The Stem

Elevate your fit with Thoughts Off The Stem. Shop new merch at the TOTS Official Store

Front view of a black Thoughts Off The Stem (TOTS) premium hoodie featuring bold white font test that reads TOTS EST. 2020 on the centre chest.
Back view of the TOTS Broadcaster hoodie showing a detailed radio tower graphic with 'Thoughts Off The Stem' integrated into the design.

They Love to Say they Know a Stoner

Justin Barone, host of Thoughts Off The Stem podcast, in a yellow hoodie featuring a graphic overlay that reads: Everyone Loves To Say They Know A Stoner - A Deep Dive in cannabis stigma normalization on Thoughts Off The Stem.

Join the Sesh and Subscribe

They Love to Say They Know a Stoner: Cannabis Stigma Normalization

Let me paint you a picture.

You’re sitting across from someone in a suit. Nice office. Firm handshake. The kind of person who irons their shirt collar and says “synergy” without irony. You’re there for a job interview, you’re trying your best to look like you definitely did not just hotbox your car in the parking garage, and everything is going fine.

And then it happens.

The interview wraps up, they walk you to the door, and just before you shake hands and part ways — they lean in. They lower their voice. They glance over their shoulder like they’re about to tell you where the bodies are buried.

“You know… I actually know someone who smokes weed.”

And then they look at you. Waiting. Expecting you to react like they just told you they know Jesus.

“Oh my GOD. YOU know a stoner?!”

I have been in more interviews and business meetings than I can count over the last year and I promise you — it happens every single time.

Level up your sesh with our hand picked essentials at Tots420.com/sesh


The Cannabis Stigma Is Alive and Well. Sort Of.

Here’s the thing about cannabis stigma in 2026 — it’s not dead, but it’s definitely on life support and arguing with the doctor about whether it really needs to be there.

Cannabis is legal in Canada. Dispensaries are on every corner. Your coworker, your boss, your accountant and probably your dentist are all quietly passing through those slightly obscured dispensary entrances on a Friday afternoon. And yet somehow the stigma persists — mostly in boardrooms and interview rooms where people who partake feel the need to hide it, and people who don’t partake feel the need to whisper about it like it’s still 1987.

I left the cannabis industry recently after working at a pot shop — genuinely one of my favourite jobs. I love the industry. It’s chaotic and weird and the people are fascinating. But I got my project management certification and spent the last year trying to break into a new field.

Which means suits. A lot of suits.

And every single one of them, at some point, pulled me aside to let me know they know a guy.


The Hushed Tones Confession

I cannot explain to you the energy of the cannabis confession in a professional setting. It is unlike anything else.

They lean in. The voice drops two octaves. The eyes scan the room for witnesses. And then they deliver this information — that they know someone who consumes a legal substance that is sold openly in stores across the country — like it is classified intelligence.

Like they’re giving you access to a secret society.

Here’s what kills me. I’ve walked into interviews and recognized faces — not because I’m great at networking, but because I sold those people weed. The person interviewing me, the receptionist who handed me the visitor badge, the guy I passed in the elevator on the way up — familiar faces everywhere.

Not because the cannabis community is small. Because it isn’t. It’s enormous and it’s everywhere and it always has been.

The suits just haven’t caught up to that reality yet.


Cannabis Normalization: Where We Actually Are

Let’s be real about where cannabis normalization actually stands right now because I think both sides of this debate are getting it wrong.

closing the gapThe Reality
Legal statusFully legal in Canada, legal in many US states
Social acceptanceGrowing rapidly but still stigmatized in professional settings
Workplace policiesMost still treat cannabis differently than alcohol despite similar effects
Public perceptionMajority of people either consume or know someone who does
Where we still struggleCorporate culture, job interviews, healthcare settings, older generations

Cannabis is not alcohol. It’s not there yet in terms of social normalization. But it’s making its mark and the gap is closing faster than most people realize — especially the people whispering about it in hallways.


The Part Nobody in the Cannabis Community Wants to Hear

Okay. Here’s where I’m going to say something that might ruffle a few leaves.

We as the cannabis community need to do better too.

We love to declare cannabis as a completely safe alternative to other substances. And in many ways it is. But that doesn’t mean it comes without its own downsides. And right now we are not being honest enough about that.

The reality is that edibles are most likely the safest way to consume cannabis. The moment you introduce any inhalant into your lungs you are introducing foreign substances into your body and your lungs are taking the brunt of that exposure. We don’t have enough long term scientific data to say with confidence that all forms of cannabis consumption are completely safe — because the research simply hasn’t been done yet. The industry, the cultivation methods and the processes are still evolving and some of the long term effects are genuinely unknown.

As a cannabis enthusiast and advocate I believe we need to recognize that. Anything in excess can cause negative health effects. Pretending otherwise doesn’t help our credibility — it undermines it.


Where Both Sides Need to Land

Here’s my take and it’s pretty simple.

The naysayers — the suits, the whisper confessors, the people who treat a legal substance like a dirty secret — need to make a concerted effort toward acceptance and normalization. Cannabis is here. It’s legal. It’s not going anywhere. The stigma serves nobody.

And the cannabis community needs to recognize that progress is actually happening and we don’t need to push as hard as we used to. We’ve won a lot of ground. Celebrating that honestly — including being honest about what we don’t know yet — is how we win the rest of it.

Meet in the middle. Normalize the conversation. Clean your bong.

Those are my thoughts off the stem. 🍃


Join the Sesh and Subscribe

🎙 Listen to the Full Episode

They Love to Say They Know a Stoner is out now — just a straight up sesh, no segments, real talk about cannabis stigma, normalization and why both sides of this debate need to take a breath.

👇 Listen or watch right now:

🎧 [SPOTIFY LINK ▶️ YOUTUBE LINK

New episodes drop every Friday at 4:20PM. Subscribe so the sesh comes straight to you — we’re pushing to 1,000 followers on Spotify and every follow counts.

Join the sesh at tots420.com 🌿


Elevate your fit with Thoughts Off The Stem. Shop new merch at the TOTS Official Store

Front view of a black Thoughts Off The Stem (TOTS) premium hoodie featuring bold white font test that reads TOTS EST. 2020 on the centre chest.
Back view of the TOTS Broadcaster hoodie showing a detailed radio tower graphic with 'Thoughts Off The Stem' integrated into the design.

Contact Thoughts Off The Stem

📺 Watch on YouTube: https://youtube.com/@thoughtsoffthestem

🎧 Listen on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/5wHWxJ1IeOtMeFWicmtwd8?si=9ad56a63eb694e27

Keep the show Independent: https://buymeacoffee.com/tots420

🛠️ Sesh Essentials: Tots420.com/sesh

👕 Merch: https://my-store-10fe8fc.creator-spring.com/

Everything Is Fake: Your Reality Is For Sale

Justin Barone host of Thoughts Off The Stem investigates paid protests astroturfing the Manhattan Madam and Crowds on Demand with money flying in the background

Someone slid into my DMs last week and asked me to have a guest on the podcast.

Now I get approached from time to time and most of the time it’s pretty straightforward. But this one stopped me cold. Because the person reaching out was Kristin M. Davis — better known as the Manhattan Madam — and she wanted me to interview the CEO of a company called Crowds on Demand.

So I did what any self respecting pothead would do. I went down the rabbit hole.

What I found was way more interesting than any interview would have been. And honestly? Way more disturbing.


What Is Astroturfing and Why Should You Care?

Before we get into the Manhattan Madam and the fake protest guy, let’s talk about astroturfing — because if you don’t know what it is, you need to.

Astroturfing is the practice of manufacturing the appearance of grassroots public support where none actually exists. The name comes from AstroTurf — the fake grass — because that’s exactly what it is. Fake grass roots.

Paid protests and astroturfing go hand in hand and in 2026 the industry is booming. According to public reporting, Crowds on Demand saw a 400% surge in paid protest requests in 2025 alone. That’s not a niche service anymore. That’s an industry.

And somebody is buying it.

Listen to the sesh:

Thoughts Off The Stem | Cannabis Infused Comedy
Thoughts Off The Stem | Cannabis Infused Comedy
Meta Glasses: Kiss Privacy GoodBye
Loading
/

Meet the Manhattan Madam: Kristin M. Davis

Let’s start with who reached out to me because this is where it gets immediately weird.

Kristin M. Davis — the Manhattan Madam — ran a high end prostitution ring in New York City that allegedly serviced some very prominent clients including Eliot Spitzer, Alex Rodriguez and David Beckham. She served time at Rikers Island, ran for Governor of New York in 2010, was contacted by Robert Mueller’s office in 2018 in connection with Russian election interference, and was later convicted for distributing drugs.

She has since founded Hope House to help women in need — and I’ll give her credit for that because second chances are real and people do change.

But now she runs a PR firm called Think Right PR that specializes in rebranding people and companies with — let’s call it complicated public histories. And she reached out to me to have Adam Swart, the CEO of Crowds on Demand, on my show to talk about the mechanics of fake protests and manufactured reality.

I’ll be honest. My first thought was — why would the Manhattan Madam be repping the fake protest guy?

My second thought was — actually that makes perfect sense.

Crowds on Demand: Your Reality Has a Price Tag

Here’s what Crowds on Demand actually is.

Adam Swart founded the company in 2012. It started with “celebrity experience” services — fake paparazzi, hired fans, that kind of thing. Over time it expanded into organized protests, political demonstrations, and publicity stunts using paid actors posing as members of the public.

In plain English — you can buy a crowd. Right now. Today.

ServiceWhat They SayWhat It Actually Is
Celebrity Arrival ServiceProfessional crowd for your eventHired fans to make you look important
Advocacy Group CreationWe create and staff advocacy groups with suitable leadershipInventing fake grassroots organizations from scratch with hired actors as “leaders”
Protest OrganizationAmplifying your message through demonstrationsPaid protesters starting at $39.99 per activist
Mergers & Acquisitions SupportShaping public company dealsManufacturing protests to tank a competitor’s stock price
Message AmplificationWhen other strategies have failedWhen the truth isn’t working — buy a fake consensus instead

A Washington Post columnist described receiving a marketing email from the company offering their “Celebrity Arrival Service” to politicians — promising to stuff events with paid actors to make candidates look popular.

John Oliver dedicated a segment on Last Week Tonight to them. They’ve been sued for alleged extortion. They’ve been accused of creating a fake Black Lives Matter organization in Dallas called Dallas Justice Now that sent letters urging wealthy white families not to send their kids to Ivy League universities. The same Republican marketing firm was also behind a pro-police group called Keep Dallas Safe.

Both sides. Same company. Same fake grass.

And demand is up 400%.

The Whistleblower Who Won’t Blow the Whistle

Here’s where it gets really rich.

Swart is now positioning himself as a whistleblower. He wants to come clean about the fake protest industry. Says he wants transparency. And to expose the manufactured outrage machine.

Except — he won’t name his clients. He won’t name his sources. And his company bio still openly boasts about creating fake advocacy groups from scratch.

Let me say that again. The guy who wants to blow the whistle on astroturfing still sells astroturfing.

Here’s a breakdown of what his own bio says versus what it actually means:

What His Bio SaysWhat It Actually Means
“We create advocacy groups and staff them with suitable leadership”We invent fake organizations and hire actors to pretend to be their leaders
“We shaped large public company mergers and acquisitions”We manufactured protests to pressure companies into deals
“We amplify messages when other strategies have failed”When the truth isn’t working we manufacture a fake consensus
“I want transparency in the protest industry”I want to be the regulated gatekeeper of the very deception I pioneered

When you’re whistleblowing you’re supposed to do it for the better of society — not for the better of your bank account.

He isn’t blowing the whistle because he grew a conscience. He’s blowing the whistle to become the “legitimate” face of an industry he built. It’s the same hustle with a press release attached.

The Inversion of Truth: Two Peas in a Very Shady Pod

Here’s what struck me most when I put these two together.

Davis uses her criminal past to create trust as an expert on corruption. Swart uses fake crowds to create the appearance of truth through manufactured consensus.

They are both selling the same thing — the idea that nothing is real, so you might as well buy their version of reality.

The PeopleKristin M. DavisAdam Swart
BackgroundManhattan Madam, convicted felon, Mueller witnessFormer journalist turned fake protest entrepreneur
Current pitchReformed criminal turned PR expert on scandalFake protest pioneer turned whistleblower
What they’re sellingTrust through criminal credibilityTruth through manufactured consensus
The hustleMy past makes me an expert on deceptionMy deception makes me qualified to expose deception
What they won’t revealThe full client list from her pastCurrent client list and protest contracts

It’s not a reformation. It’s an expansion of the same hustle with better branding.


So Should I Have Him On The Show?

I asked my audience this at the end of the episode and I’m asking you here too — because I genuinely don’t know.

On one hand I don’t think I’ll get an honest conversation. He won’t name clients. He won’t name sources. And everything about the way this pitch landed in my DMs feels like exactly the kind of manufactured narrative his company specializes in.

On the other hand — sometimes the most interesting interviews are the ones where you already know the guy is full of it.

What do you think? Drop it in the comments. Should I have Adam Swart on Thoughts Off The Stem?


The Real Issue Nobody Wants to Talk About

Here’s the thing that actually bothers me most about all of this.

Most people can’t be bothered to protest. Real grassroots movements are hard. They require time, energy, belief and sacrifice. The fact that there’s a booming market for fake protests tells you something really important — the people with money have figured out that they can skip all of that and just buy the appearance of public support instead.

Your outrage is for sale. Your reality is manufactured. And most people scrolling their feed have no idea whether the protest they just watched was organic or ordered off a menu at $39.99 per head.

I basically assume at this point that anything I watch or read is at least partially bullshit. And honestly? That’s a really exhausting way to live.

So smoke one, think critically, and maybe — just maybe — question the next “spontaneous” protest you see trending on your feed.

Those are my thoughts off the stem. 🍃


🎙 Listen to the Full Episode

Everything Is Fake: Your Reality Is for Sale is out now on Spotify and YouTube.

I go deeper on both Davis and Swart, break down exactly how the fake protest machine works, and ask you directly — should I have him on the show?

👇 Listen or watch right now:

🎧 SPOTIFY LINK ▶️ YOUTUBE LINK

New episodes drop every Friday at 4:20PM. Subscribe so the sesh comes straight to you — we’re pushing to 1,000 followers on Spotify and every follow counts.

The world is full of BS, King Palm isn’t – just like Thoughts Off The Stem. Relax and enjoy a longer smoother, full flavored sesh.

Join the sesh at tots420.com 🌿

Contact Thoiughts Off The Stem

Research links for the Sesh:

https://crowdsondemand.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristin_M._Davis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowds_on_Demand

https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/concerned-citizens-turn-out-to-be-political-theater/2021439/

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-03-14/paid-protester-company-looking-to-hire-7-foot-300-pound-giants-for-intimidation-factor

From the Manosphere to Marijuana: Big Ego’s make Cranky Toddlers

Podcast thumbnail for 'From the Manosphere to Marijuana: It's All Ego and Cranky Toddlers.' The image shows host Justin Barone in the center with a neon 'Thoughts Off The Stem' sign behind him. On the right, the Tate brothers are depicted with smoke effects. The layout includes bold yellow and white text and a prominent red 'WATCH NOW' button in the lower-left corner.

From The Manosphere to Marijuana: Comparing Tactics and Ideologies

From the Manosphere to Marijuana, what do a 1930s paper tycoon, the DuPont family, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and a modern-day “Alpha” influencer have in common? They are all fueled by the same thing: A massive, fragile ego, an overabundance of pride, and a scorned inner child who runs the show. In our latest Seshisode of Thoughts Off The Stem, we’re exploring the link between the Manosphere and Marijuana. We’re talking about Louis Theroux’s Inside the Manosphere documentary and connecting the dots to the “Great Hemp Wars” of 1937. It turns out, the history of cannabis prohibition and the rise of the “Taint”—sorry, the Tate brothers—are fueled by the exact same playbook: fear, gaslighting, and overcompensation.

The PeopletHEIR BACKGROUND

William Randolph Hearst
was an American newspaper publisher and politician who developed the nation’s largest newspaper chain and media company, Hearst Communications.

The DuPonts
Du Ponts have been one of the country’s richest families since the mid-19th century, when they founded their fortune in the gunpowder business. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they expanded their wealth through the chemical industry and the automotive industry

Harry J. Anslinger
was an American government official who served as the first commissioner of the U.S. Treasury Department‘s Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Inside The Manosphere: Ultra Masculine and Ultra Fragile

I recently watched the Louis Theroux doc, and like everyone else, I’m familiar with the ultra-masculine “women are only here to serve men” schtick. But honestly, It’s exhausting. These dudes are basically frat bros in the wild, uttering the stupidest collection of words I’ve ever heard while contradicting their own ideologies.

Take HSTikkyTokky—a name that sounds like a five-year-old’s favorite toy. Seriously it sounds like something that lights up and play sounds when you push it’s keys. Definitely not very masculine if you ask me. He preaches “masculinity” and says he doesn’t hate anyone, yet his content is a factory for hate speech and chaos. It’s all for the stream, all for the money. Young men following this movement need to wake up and see the parallel between the Manosphere and Marijuana prohibition: both rely on selling a false “authority” based on fear.

New Age Street-Corner Prophets: How the Manosphere Sells Insecurity

Their logic claims women are “born with value” (purely physical), while men must “create value” through financial wealth, supercar collections and a haram of women if they want. If you think a woman’s value is limited to anatomy, and men have no value, you’re a lunatic. Character is what gives us value. It’s what separates men, from boys, women, from girls and good people from losers.

When Andrew Tate brags about throwing a fight to bet on himself and triple his money, he isn’t being “manly”—he’s being a snake. These guys are nothing more than street-corner prophets in shiny suits, funding their lifestyles through the pockets of easily manipulated young men. Let’s call the Tate brothers what they are: The Taint Brothers. They are that smooth, untouched part of the male anatomy between the balls and the a**-hole.

They aren’t men; they’re boys starved for attention, protecting their fragile egos by degrading others because they never got enough hugs.

The ORIGINAL Manosphere

In keeping with this high level of self-absorbed nonsense, let’s look at how a group of old rich white guys successfully lobbied to criminalize marijuana. They didn’t want to make life better; they just wanted to protect their wallets. So instead of revolutionizing their industries and using or switching to more natural products, they lobbied congress to institute the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Instead of trying to make life better for the human collective they decided they needed the most money so, they said screw society, our profits are more important, and they launched a what would be the beginning of the war on weed.

William Randolph Hearst:

A pulp and paper giant worth $200 million in the early 1900s—the equivalent of owning the moon today. He didn’t want hemp competing with his timber. He couldn’t be bothered to retrofit or even change some of his pulp and paper mills to hemp textile factories, because as you know, white rich guys don’t want to give away a penny unless they get back 6. A little short sighted. Hemp is much more durable than paper.

The DuPonts:

In 1935, they released Nylon. Hemp was a direct threat to this new petroleum-based technology, so DuPont decided it had to go. Cause why use an eco friendly substitute, when you can use sinthetics to create what the natural world already did. Sure, hemp is a little more itchy but we’d have a lot less plastic in the ocean.

Harry J. Anslinger:

The first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. He was the original “talking head” bully, using gaslighting and fear to make a name for himself. Just like the Tate brothers, he needed to be the authority on something. He was probably just following the lead of the other two, but he bought their lies, hook, line and sinker.

The Manosphere and Marijuana: Gaslighting and Fear Mongering

When you compare the Manosphere and Marijuana history, you see the Anslinger Tactic in full effect:

  1. Create Fear: Print articles claiming cannabis makes you a killer.
  2. Divide the Public: Spew hate and lies to make something harmless look like the “worst evil imaginable.”
  3. Target for Assassination: Use lobbyists (the 1930s version of “bot farms”) to kill the competition.

From the Manosphere to Marijuana we Need a Beginners Guide

If you want to learn more about cannabis and how it works. Check out our Cannabis 101 guide. Educate yourself before you make snap judgements. Do the opposite, of the hyper masculine dopes in this post.

Join the Sesh on Youtube or Spotify

Contact Thoughts Off The Stem

Thoughts Off The Stem - Cannabis Infused Comedy Podcast Logo

Absurd Humor adam swart astroturfing Bone Smashing Cannabis and Skin Cannabis Beauty Cannabis Comedy Cannabis Education Cannabis Effects Cannabis Podcast cannnabis comedy Clavicular Comedy Podcast crowds on demand Digital Age Does Weed Cause Acne Gen Z High High Thoughts Incel Culture Justin Barone kristin M Davis Looksmaxxing manhattan madam Manosphere Mental Health Observational Humor paid protests Relatable Comedy relationship comedy sarcastic comedy Self Improvement social commentary Society and Culture stoner comedy Stoner Philosophy THC and Skin the manosphere Thoughts Off The Stem Tinctures Topicals TOTS420 Vaping Weed Facts Weed History

Stop Working For Free: Social Exposure Doesn’t Pay The Bills

TOTS420 podcast host with a sign saying Exposure Doesn't Pay The Bills, featuring a chart comparing Frosty Cake and Campfire Smoke quality.

Paying with exposure is a hustle that belongs in a buddy’s garage, not a professional business.

Why Paying With Exposure Doesn’t Work in the Real World

Imagine walking into a local pot shop, asking for an ounce of top-shelf flower, and offering to settle the tab with a shout-out on your Instagram story. You’d be laughed right out of the building. Why? Because legitimate industries don’t run on “vibes” or “likes,” yet in the podcasting world, my inbox is treated like a black market dealer’s garage where everyone expects a free bag in exchange for a few errands.

Welcome to Thoughts Off The Stem. I’m Justin Barone, and I hope life is being good to you, because lately, life has been acting like a prospecting pimp and I’m his prospective hoe. Recently, a couple of companies reached out with their pimp hand asking for me to get on the track and work for nothing but a slap in the face.

Light them if you got them, ‘cause here’s how these “exposure” deals played out.

The Worst “Paying With Exposure” Brand Deals I’ve Seen

Recently, a few companies reached out with “opportunities” that were really just chores in disguise. If you’re a creator, watch out for these red flags.

1. The Tin Joint Holder Tactic

A company reached out wanting a full suite of content: social shorts, feed posts, stories, a website feature on Tots420.com, and a spot on my YouTube review playlist.

  • The Offer: A free sample.
  • The Reality: They asked for my rates, saw them, and vanished. If you want a billboard, you have to pay the lease. A $10 tin doesn’t buy a week of production time.

2. The AI Tool That Wanted a Free Employee

This one was a masterclass in audacity. An AI podcast editing tool wanted a “partnership” where I would:

  • Edit one episode a week for three months using their (buggy) software.
  • Act as their unpaid QA and R&D department (reporting bugs and UI feedback).
  • Give them free rights to all my content for their ads.
  • The Payment: Use of the software.

Pro Tip: If a company asks you to find the bugs in their product while you advertise it for them, they aren’t a partner—you’re an unpaid intern.


Weed Facts: Stop Chasing THC Percentages

Before we get deeper into the “Dude, For Real?” files, let’s clear the air on some cultivation myths. THC potency is not the ultimate qualification for good weed. High potency is a byproduct of great cultivation, but a lower percentage doesn’t mean it’s “bad.”

Beyond the Hype: Weed Facts and Quality Control

Since we’re talking about high-quality work, let’s talk about high-quality flower. THC potency isn’t everything—potency is a byproduct of great cultivation.

How to Spot “Mid” Weed vs. Top-Shelf Flower

FeatureWhat to Look For
SmellPungent, bold, and nuanced. It should make your brain say, “I want to eat this.”
LookVibrant colors (whites, reds, oranges) with visible, “frosted” trichomes like a cake.
FeelSticky and slightly spongy. Stems should snap, not bend like celery.
StructureSativas should be light and fluffy; Indicas should be tight and dense.

The Red Flags of “Bad” Weed:

  • The “Musty” Nose: If it smells like a damp basement or a pile of straw, it’s aged or compromised.
  • The “Brown Sugar” Look: If the trichomes are amber and the bud is dirt-brown or lime-green, it’s past its prime.
  • The “Brittle” Touch: If it crumbles into dust or feels “wet” and tears apart instead of breaking, the cure was botched.

Dude, For Real? The “Exposure” Hall of Fame

They say there are no dumb questions, but the “Choosing Beggars” of the world prove that wrong every day. Whether it’s HuffPo asking for free articles while being a multi-million dollar entity or the guy who thinks Garlic is a valid currency for labor—the entitlement is real.

We’ve all seen the screenshots. The mechanic who gets asked for a “quick fix” for free, or the photographer (shoutout to the legends on BoredPanda) who gets told their work is “overpriced” because “I could do that with a filter.”

The bottom line: Exposure doesn’t pay the bills. Quality—whether in your flower or your content—costs money. If you want the “frosting,” you can’t pay with “crumbs.”


What’s Your Worst “Choosing Beggar” Story?

Have you ever been offered “exposure” in exchange for your hard-earned expertise? Drop a comment below or hit me up on socials. Let’s vent.

Want more unfiltered takes on the industry? Check out our Off The Stem Reviews

  • [Stay tuned to Tots420.com for more “off the stem” thoughts]

Watch or Listen on SpotifyContact Thoughts Off The Stem

Absurd Humor adam swart astroturfing Bone Smashing Cannabis and Skin Cannabis Beauty Cannabis Comedy Cannabis Education Cannabis Effects Cannabis Podcast cannnabis comedy Clavicular Comedy Podcast crowds on demand Digital Age Does Weed Cause Acne Gen Z High High Thoughts Incel Culture Justin Barone kristin M Davis Looksmaxxing manhattan madam Manosphere Mental Health Observational Humor paid protests Relatable Comedy relationship comedy sarcastic comedy Self Improvement social commentary Society and Culture stoner comedy Stoner Philosophy THC and Skin the manosphere Thoughts Off The Stem Tinctures Topicals TOTS420 Vaping Weed Facts Weed History