Everything Is Fake: Your Reality Is For Sale

Justin Barone host of Thoughts Off The Stem investigates paid protests astroturfing the Manhattan Madam and Crowds on Demand with money flying in the background

Someone slid into my DMs last week and asked me to have a guest on the podcast.

Now I get approached from time to time and most of the time it’s pretty straightforward. But this one stopped me cold. Because the person reaching out was Kristin M. Davis — better known as the Manhattan Madam — and she wanted me to interview the CEO of a company called Crowds on Demand.

So I did what any self respecting pothead would do. I went down the rabbit hole.

What I found was way more interesting than any interview would have been. And honestly? Way more disturbing.


What Is Astroturfing and Why Should You Care?

Before we get into the Manhattan Madam and the fake protest guy, let’s talk about astroturfing — because if you don’t know what it is, you need to.

Astroturfing is the practice of manufacturing the appearance of grassroots public support where none actually exists. The name comes from AstroTurf — the fake grass — because that’s exactly what it is. Fake grass roots.

Paid protests and astroturfing go hand in hand and in 2026 the industry is booming. According to public reporting, Crowds on Demand saw a 400% surge in paid protest requests in 2025 alone. That’s not a niche service anymore. That’s an industry.

And somebody is buying it.

Listen to the sesh:

Thoughts Off The Stem | Cannabis Infused Comedy
Thoughts Off The Stem | Cannabis Infused Comedy
They Love to Say they Know a Stoner
Loading
/

Meet the Manhattan Madam: Kristin M. Davis

Let’s start with who reached out to me because this is where it gets immediately weird.

Kristin M. Davis — the Manhattan Madam — ran a high end prostitution ring in New York City that allegedly serviced some very prominent clients including Eliot Spitzer, Alex Rodriguez and David Beckham. She served time at Rikers Island, ran for Governor of New York in 2010, was contacted by Robert Mueller’s office in 2018 in connection with Russian election interference, and was later convicted for distributing drugs.

She has since founded Hope House to help women in need — and I’ll give her credit for that because second chances are real and people do change.

But now she runs a PR firm called Think Right PR that specializes in rebranding people and companies with — let’s call it complicated public histories. And she reached out to me to have Adam Swart, the CEO of Crowds on Demand, on my show to talk about the mechanics of fake protests and manufactured reality.

I’ll be honest. My first thought was — why would the Manhattan Madam be repping the fake protest guy?

My second thought was — actually that makes perfect sense.

Crowds on Demand: Your Reality Has a Price Tag

Here’s what Crowds on Demand actually is.

Adam Swart founded the company in 2012. It started with “celebrity experience” services — fake paparazzi, hired fans, that kind of thing. Over time it expanded into organized protests, political demonstrations, and publicity stunts using paid actors posing as members of the public.

In plain English — you can buy a crowd. Right now. Today.

ServiceWhat They SayWhat It Actually Is
Celebrity Arrival ServiceProfessional crowd for your eventHired fans to make you look important
Advocacy Group CreationWe create and staff advocacy groups with suitable leadershipInventing fake grassroots organizations from scratch with hired actors as “leaders”
Protest OrganizationAmplifying your message through demonstrationsPaid protesters starting at $39.99 per activist
Mergers & Acquisitions SupportShaping public company dealsManufacturing protests to tank a competitor’s stock price
Message AmplificationWhen other strategies have failedWhen the truth isn’t working — buy a fake consensus instead

A Washington Post columnist described receiving a marketing email from the company offering their “Celebrity Arrival Service” to politicians — promising to stuff events with paid actors to make candidates look popular.

John Oliver dedicated a segment on Last Week Tonight to them. They’ve been sued for alleged extortion. They’ve been accused of creating a fake Black Lives Matter organization in Dallas called Dallas Justice Now that sent letters urging wealthy white families not to send their kids to Ivy League universities. The same Republican marketing firm was also behind a pro-police group called Keep Dallas Safe.

Both sides. Same company. Same fake grass.

And demand is up 400%.

The Whistleblower Who Won’t Blow the Whistle

Here’s where it gets really rich.

Swart is now positioning himself as a whistleblower. He wants to come clean about the fake protest industry. Says he wants transparency. And to expose the manufactured outrage machine.

Except — he won’t name his clients. He won’t name his sources. And his company bio still openly boasts about creating fake advocacy groups from scratch.

Let me say that again. The guy who wants to blow the whistle on astroturfing still sells astroturfing.

Here’s a breakdown of what his own bio says versus what it actually means:

What His Bio SaysWhat It Actually Means
“We create advocacy groups and staff them with suitable leadership”We invent fake organizations and hire actors to pretend to be their leaders
“We shaped large public company mergers and acquisitions”We manufactured protests to pressure companies into deals
“We amplify messages when other strategies have failed”When the truth isn’t working we manufacture a fake consensus
“I want transparency in the protest industry”I want to be the regulated gatekeeper of the very deception I pioneered

When you’re whistleblowing you’re supposed to do it for the better of society — not for the better of your bank account.

He isn’t blowing the whistle because he grew a conscience. He’s blowing the whistle to become the “legitimate” face of an industry he built. It’s the same hustle with a press release attached.

The Inversion of Truth: Two Peas in a Very Shady Pod

Here’s what struck me most when I put these two together.

Davis uses her criminal past to create trust as an expert on corruption. Swart uses fake crowds to create the appearance of truth through manufactured consensus.

They are both selling the same thing — the idea that nothing is real, so you might as well buy their version of reality.

The PeopleKristin M. DavisAdam Swart
BackgroundManhattan Madam, convicted felon, Mueller witnessFormer journalist turned fake protest entrepreneur
Current pitchReformed criminal turned PR expert on scandalFake protest pioneer turned whistleblower
What they’re sellingTrust through criminal credibilityTruth through manufactured consensus
The hustleMy past makes me an expert on deceptionMy deception makes me qualified to expose deception
What they won’t revealThe full client list from her pastCurrent client list and protest contracts

It’s not a reformation. It’s an expansion of the same hustle with better branding.


So Should I Have Him On The Show?

I asked my audience this at the end of the episode and I’m asking you here too — because I genuinely don’t know.

On one hand I don’t think I’ll get an honest conversation. He won’t name clients. He won’t name sources. And everything about the way this pitch landed in my DMs feels like exactly the kind of manufactured narrative his company specializes in.

On the other hand — sometimes the most interesting interviews are the ones where you already know the guy is full of it.

What do you think? Drop it in the comments. Should I have Adam Swart on Thoughts Off The Stem?


The Real Issue Nobody Wants to Talk About

Here’s the thing that actually bothers me most about all of this.

Most people can’t be bothered to protest. Real grassroots movements are hard. They require time, energy, belief and sacrifice. The fact that there’s a booming market for fake protests tells you something really important — the people with money have figured out that they can skip all of that and just buy the appearance of public support instead.

Your outrage is for sale. Your reality is manufactured. And most people scrolling their feed have no idea whether the protest they just watched was organic or ordered off a menu at $39.99 per head.

I basically assume at this point that anything I watch or read is at least partially bullshit. And honestly? That’s a really exhausting way to live.

So smoke one, think critically, and maybe — just maybe — question the next “spontaneous” protest you see trending on your feed.

Those are my thoughts off the stem. 🍃


🎙 Listen to the Full Episode

Everything Is Fake: Your Reality Is for Sale is out now on Spotify and YouTube.

I go deeper on both Davis and Swart, break down exactly how the fake protest machine works, and ask you directly — should I have him on the show?

👇 Listen or watch right now:

🎧 SPOTIFY LINK ▶️ YOUTUBE LINK

New episodes drop every Friday at 4:20PM. Subscribe so the sesh comes straight to you — we’re pushing to 1,000 followers on Spotify and every follow counts.

The world is full of BS, King Palm isn’t – just like Thoughts Off The Stem. Relax and enjoy a longer smoother, full flavored sesh.

Join the sesh at tots420.com 🌿

Contact Thoiughts Off The Stem

Research links for the Sesh:

https://crowdsondemand.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristin_M._Davis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowds_on_Demand

https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/concerned-citizens-turn-out-to-be-political-theater/2021439/

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-03-14/paid-protester-company-looking-to-hire-7-foot-300-pound-giants-for-intimidation-factor

8 Disturbing Looksmaxxing Incel Culture Secrets You Need To Know

Justin Barone host of Thoughts Off The Stem podcast reacts to looksmaxxing and incel culture with Ken and Barbie figures representing unrealistic beauty standards

Looksmaxxing and incel culture have produced some truly unhinged ideas over the years — but hitting yourself in the face with a hammer to get dates might be the one that finally broke me. There are grown men doing this. On purpose. With an actual hammer. And they have hundreds of thousands of followers cheering them on.

I’ll let that sink in for a second.

Welcome to the world of looksmaxxing — the incel community’s full-send obsession with optimizing your physical appearance at all costs. And I mean ALL costs. We’re talking steroids at 14, crystal meth to hollow your cheeks, and a daily hammer session to your jaw because apparently that’s a thing people do now.

I’m Justin Barone. I’m 44 years old, I’m 260 lbs, and I used to be fit back in my 30s when I was about 185. Somewhere between Doritos and laziness I became what these kids would probably classify as some kind of ogre. But you know what? I still figured out that personality is the move. These kids apparently haven’t gotten that memo yet.

Let’s get into it.


What Is Looksmaxxing and Incel Culture?

Looksmaxxing is the practice of maximizing your physical attractiveness — and it started in incel culture. Incel, if you don’t know, stands for involuntarily celibate. These are dudes who can’t get a date and have decided that the reason is entirely their bone structure.

Looksmaxxing and incel culture are more connected than most people realize — the whole movement was born on incel message boards before it jumped to TikTok.

The movement got a massive boost from a 19-year-old content creator named Clavicular — and yes, that’s his actual name, or at least his online name. Braden. His name is Braden. I don’t know what we expected.

At 14 years old this kid started taking testosterone, using steroids, and by his own admission on camera — meth. Why meth? Because he thought it was basically just street Adderall. One derivative away, he says. He also took a hammer to his face every single day.

Not to bits and pieces. Just until it got red and puffy. Because he believed it would create micro fractures in his jaw that would heal into a sharper, more square jawline.

You know what else gives you a sharper jawline? Puberty. Which he was going through at the time. But he couldn’t wait.

This guy is now 19, has hundreds of thousands of followers, and allegedly earns over $100,000 a month teaching other young men how to do what he did. And somehow we as a society have decided this is acceptable.

I take partial blame. Not personally. But as a generation? Yeah. We dropped the ball.


Where Did We Go Wrong?

The looksmaxxing community and incel culture didn’t create these insecurities in young men — but it weaponized them.

When I was a teenager and I wasn’t getting invited to parties — and I wasn’t always, I was a chunky kid with a belly from eating too many Doritos — I didn’t smash my face with a hammer. Instead I went outside. Mingling with actual humans and correcting my personality in real time through real interaction was how you figured things out back then.

These kids don’t have to do that anymore. They can find a corner of the internet that validates whatever insane thing they’re thinking, and that corner will attach itself to them and grow. Before you know it you’ve got a 19-year-old doing meth for his skincare routine and an audience of young boys watching him do it.

I asked my kids about looksmaxxing. You know what they did? They rolled their eyes. Both of them. “Can you believe it, dad?” No. No I cannot. But I went deep on this one so you don’t have to.


The Weed Facts: Does Cannabis Actually Affect How You Look?

Since we’re talking about looks this week I figured we’d pivot to something actually relevant — what does weed do to your skin? Because if you’re going to take a hammer to your face you should probably know what your edibles are doing to your collagen first.

This segment’s facts come from Cosmopolitan, who spoke with dermatologist Dr. Karan Lal, MD. Here’s the breakdown:

FactorWhat Cannabis DoesThe Verdict
Testosterone & AcneTHC may slightly increase testosterone, which spikes oil productionCould cause breakouts in some people
Appetite & Glycemic IndexMunchies + carbs = higher glycemic indexAssociated with increased acne
Anti-inflammatory EffectsTHC is anti-inflammatory, may calm inflammatory pimplesCould actually help some skin issues
Stress & CortisolWeed can reduce anxiety, lowering cortisolLess stress = less oil = less acne
Skin PickingTHC may reduce itch and irritationCould help chronic skin pickers relax
Edibles & SugarGummies contain sugar that causes glycation — stiffening collagen and elastinCould contribute to sagging and wrinkles
Smoking & SkinSmoke sits on your skin and can irritate itExternal irritant regardless of strain
Dirty EquipmentUnwashed pipes and bongs spread bacteriaCan cause acne around your mouth

The honest takeaway? It’s not really the weed. It’s what you put in your body and how you take care of yourself. Clean your bong. Watch the sugar in your gummies. Manage your stress. That’s basically your cannabis skincare routine right there.

Oh, and I’ll say this — I’ve been smoking pretty regularly for years and I still get the occasional pimple along my hat line. I think it has more to do with cleaning your skin than anything else.


Dude For Real: The Looksmaxxing Terminology You Need to Know

This stuff comes straight from the looksmaxxing community and I genuinely couldn’t believe some of these are real terms that people use with a straight face. This week’s Dude For Real comes from Buzzfeed’s looksmaxxing explainer and dude — for real.

TermWhat It Means
MoggingDisplaying physical superiority over someone nearby
SoftmaxxingImproving looks through skincare, diet, exercise, grooming
HardmaxxingExtreme methods — surgery, steroids, bone smashing
Bone SmashingHitting your face with a hammer to create micro fractures that reshape your jaw
AscendingSignificantly improving your physical attractiveness. The looksmaxxing version of a glow up
MewingResting your tongue on the roof of your mouth to sharpen your jawline
The PSL ScaleA scoring system for facial attractiveness based on harmony, symmetry, and sexual dimorphism
Chad / StaceyHighly attractive man or woman. Top of the PSL scale
SubhumanThe lowest PSL score. The most unattractive. Literally called subhuman
Sub 5Anyone ranking below a 5 on the PSL scale — considered unattractive
LookismThe belief that your value and place in the world are determined entirely by your looks
Gesture MaxxingUsing humor to attract women rather than appearance
Femoid / FoidA dehumanizing term for women. Short for female humanoid
Hunter EyesAlmond-shaped, deep-set eyes with low brows — considered highly attractive

The system literally calls people subhuman based on their face. That’s not self improvement. That’s a cult with better lighting.


Looksmaxxing, Incel Culture and Why Personality Is the Real Move

If you’re not getting invited to parties — and I say this with love — it’s probably not your jawline. It’s probably your personality.

You can change everything about how you look. Get the surgery. Smash your face. Chew the gum. But when the mask comes off — and it always does — if your personality is garbage, people are going to figure that out. As a result they’re going to walk away every single time.

I’ve seen the ugliest people with the most friends because most people genuinely do not care what you look like. Instead they care whether you’re fun to be around, whether you make them laugh, and whether you’re loyal. That’s it. That’s the whole list.

Be that person. That’s the move. Not the hammer.

That’s the real problem with looksmaxxing and incel culture — it sells young men the idea that their value is their face, and there’s nothing they can do about it except suffer or smash.

As for Clavicular — I watched a bunch of his content researching this episode. He’s shallow, uninformed, and has a massive platform teaching young boys that their value is their face. That’s a failure. And it’s on us as the older generation to push back on that wherever we can.

If your kid is watching this stuff, talk to them. Ask questions and be present. Because we can’t leave them to figure this out on the internet.

Use a hammer if you want.

Those are my thoughts off the stem.


🎙 Listen to the Full Episode

This week’s full seshisode — Looks Maxxing: Guys Who Smash Their Face With Hammers to Get Dates — is live now.

We go deeper on Clavicular, the full Dude For Real terminology breakdown, and the complete weed facts science on cannabis and your skin.

👇 Listen or watch right now:

🎧 Listen on Spotify ▶️ Watch on YouTube

New episodes drop every Friday at 4:20PM. So subscribe now so the sesh comes straight to you — because we’re pushing to 1,000 followers on Spotify and every single follow counts.

Join the sesh at tots420.com

Contact Thoughts Off The Stem


From the Manosphere to Marijuana: Big Ego’s make Cranky Toddlers

Podcast thumbnail for 'From the Manosphere to Marijuana: It's All Ego and Cranky Toddlers.' The image shows host Justin Barone in the center with a neon 'Thoughts Off The Stem' sign behind him. On the right, the Tate brothers are depicted with smoke effects. The layout includes bold yellow and white text and a prominent red 'WATCH NOW' button in the lower-left corner.

From The Manosphere to Marijuana: Comparing Tactics and Ideologies

From the Manosphere to Marijuana, what do a 1930s paper tycoon, the DuPont family, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics and a modern-day “Alpha” influencer have in common? They are all fueled by the same thing: A massive, fragile ego, an overabundance of pride, and a scorned inner child who runs the show. In our latest Seshisode of Thoughts Off The Stem, we’re exploring the link between the Manosphere and Marijuana. We’re talking about Louis Theroux’s Inside the Manosphere documentary and connecting the dots to the “Great Hemp Wars” of 1937. It turns out, the history of cannabis prohibition and the rise of the “Taint”—sorry, the Tate brothers—are fueled by the exact same playbook: fear, gaslighting, and overcompensation.

The PeopletHEIR BACKGROUND

William Randolph Hearst
was an American newspaper publisher and politician who developed the nation’s largest newspaper chain and media company, Hearst Communications.

The DuPonts
Du Ponts have been one of the country’s richest families since the mid-19th century, when they founded their fortune in the gunpowder business. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they expanded their wealth through the chemical industry and the automotive industry

Harry J. Anslinger
was an American government official who served as the first commissioner of the U.S. Treasury Department‘s Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Inside The Manosphere: Ultra Masculine and Ultra Fragile

I recently watched the Louis Theroux doc, and like everyone else, I’m familiar with the ultra-masculine “women are only here to serve men” schtick. But honestly, It’s exhausting. These dudes are basically frat bros in the wild, uttering the stupidest collection of words I’ve ever heard while contradicting their own ideologies.

Take HSTikkyTokky—a name that sounds like a five-year-old’s favorite toy. Seriously it sounds like something that lights up and play sounds when you push it’s keys. Definitely not very masculine if you ask me. He preaches “masculinity” and says he doesn’t hate anyone, yet his content is a factory for hate speech and chaos. It’s all for the stream, all for the money. Young men following this movement need to wake up and see the parallel between the Manosphere and Marijuana prohibition: both rely on selling a false “authority” based on fear.

New Age Street-Corner Prophets: How the Manosphere Sells Insecurity

Their logic claims women are “born with value” (purely physical), while men must “create value” through financial wealth, supercar collections and a haram of women if they want. If you think a woman’s value is limited to anatomy, and men have no value, you’re a lunatic. Character is what gives us value. It’s what separates men, from boys, women, from girls and good people from losers.

When Andrew Tate brags about throwing a fight to bet on himself and triple his money, he isn’t being “manly”—he’s being a snake. These guys are nothing more than street-corner prophets in shiny suits, funding their lifestyles through the pockets of easily manipulated young men. Let’s call the Tate brothers what they are: The Taint Brothers. They are that smooth, untouched part of the male anatomy between the balls and the a**-hole.

They aren’t men; they’re boys starved for attention, protecting their fragile egos by degrading others because they never got enough hugs.

The ORIGINAL Manosphere

In keeping with this high level of self-absorbed nonsense, let’s look at how a group of old rich white guys successfully lobbied to criminalize marijuana. They didn’t want to make life better; they just wanted to protect their wallets. So instead of revolutionizing their industries and using or switching to more natural products, they lobbied congress to institute the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Instead of trying to make life better for the human collective they decided they needed the most money so, they said screw society, our profits are more important, and they launched a what would be the beginning of the war on weed.

William Randolph Hearst:

A pulp and paper giant worth $200 million in the early 1900s—the equivalent of owning the moon today. He didn’t want hemp competing with his timber. He couldn’t be bothered to retrofit or even change some of his pulp and paper mills to hemp textile factories, because as you know, white rich guys don’t want to give away a penny unless they get back 6. A little short sighted. Hemp is much more durable than paper.

The DuPonts:

In 1935, they released Nylon. Hemp was a direct threat to this new petroleum-based technology, so DuPont decided it had to go. Cause why use an eco friendly substitute, when you can use sinthetics to create what the natural world already did. Sure, hemp is a little more itchy but we’d have a lot less plastic in the ocean.

Harry J. Anslinger:

The first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. He was the original “talking head” bully, using gaslighting and fear to make a name for himself. Just like the Tate brothers, he needed to be the authority on something. He was probably just following the lead of the other two, but he bought their lies, hook, line and sinker.

The Manosphere and Marijuana: Gaslighting and Fear Mongering

When you compare the Manosphere and Marijuana history, you see the Anslinger Tactic in full effect:

  1. Create Fear: Print articles claiming cannabis makes you a killer.
  2. Divide the Public: Spew hate and lies to make something harmless look like the “worst evil imaginable.”
  3. Target for Assassination: Use lobbyists (the 1930s version of “bot farms”) to kill the competition.

From the Manosphere to Marijuana we Need a Beginners Guide

If you want to learn more about cannabis and how it works. Check out our Cannabis 101 guide. Educate yourself before you make snap judgements. Do the opposite, of the hyper masculine dopes in this post.

Join the Sesh on Youtube or Spotify

Contact Thoughts Off The Stem

Thoughts Off The Stem - Cannabis Infused Comedy Podcast Logo

Absurd Humor adam swart astroturfing Bone Smashing Cannabis and Skin Cannabis Beauty Cannabis Comedy Cannabis Education Cannabis Effects Cannabis Podcast cannnabis comedy Clavicular Comedy Podcast crowds on demand Digital Age Does Weed Cause Acne Edibles Gen Z High High Thoughts Incel Culture Justin Barone kristin M Davis Looksmaxxing manhattan madam Manosphere Mental Health Observational Humor paid protests Relatable Comedy sarcastic comedy Self Improvement social commentary Society and Culture stoner comedy Stoner Philosophy THC and Skin the manosphere Thoughts Off The Stem Tinctures Topicals TOTS420 Vaping Weed Facts Weed History